And I will always love you.
I will always love you.
You, my darling you. Hmm.

Bittersweet memories
that is all I’m taking with me.
So, goodbye. Please, don’t cry.
We both know I’m not what you, you need.

And I will always love you.
I will always love you.

(Instrumental solo)

I hope life treats you kind
And I hope you have all you’ve dreamed of.
And I wish to you, joy and happiness.
But above all this, I wish you love.

And I will always love you.
I will always love you.
I will always love you.
I will always love you.
I will always love you.
I, I will always love you.

You, darling, I love you.
Ooh, I’ll always, I’ll always love you.

===

Nearly two-thirds of the volunteers, average age 60, were taking vitamin or mineral supplements in 1986 when the study began. By 2008, more than 40 percent of the participants had died: The study highlighted iron supplements as the most risky because the larger the dose, the greater their risk of death. High iron levels have also been associated in previous research with an increased risk of heart disease (though the researchers added that they “cannot rule out the possibility” that health conditions leading to iron deficiency — like colon cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, or severe injuries — could have necessitated the use of iron supplements and also have led to earlier deaths).

Those who took multivitamins had a 2.4 percent greater risk of death than those taking no supplements; those who took folic acid had a 6 percent higher risk, while those who took iron had a 4 percent higher risk on average. The folic acid number might have been skewed higer because not many of the women took folic acid.
Calcium supplement users, on the other hand, had about a 4 percent lower risk of death.

Vitamin D supplements, which have become incredibly popular in recent years, weren’t evaluated in the study.
Researchers took into account exercise habits, body weight, dietary habits, level of education, and smoking habits. They also accounted for diabetes , high blood pressure, and the use of hormone therapy.

Women who took supplements were generally more highly educated, thinner, exercised more, and were less likely to have diabetes or to smoke. But they were also nearly twice as likely to have taken hormone replacement therapy since back in the 1980s, HRT was considered to be protective against heart disease, strokes, and other aging ills. We now know that HRT use actually raises the risk of such diseases, which has led to a dramatic decline in use.

When all of these differences were accounted for, supplement use didn’t appear to offer any health benefits and may have had a small downside. “Based on existing evidence, we see little justification for the general and widespread use of dietary supplements,” the authors concluded. “We recommend that they be used with strong medically based cause, such as symptomatic nutrient deficiency disease.”
In other words, skip the supplements, unless your doctor tells you that you need them for a specific reason.

Actually, not.

Younger women have denser breast tissue than older women, and so many small tumors are missed by the mammogram, while the mammograms often show things as cancer lumps that turn out to be not cancer at all.
This was the reason that the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and The American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) both agree that women under 40 do not need a mammogram before starting IVF.

Dr. Eric Widra, an infertility specialist who chairs the assisted reproductive technology committee for the ASRM sums it up by saying. “There’s no evidence to suggest that women under 40 should be screened with mammography, and there’s no reason to treat women with infertility any differently. Women get pregnant at age 36 all the time without having mammograms and those who have IVF to get pregnant aren’t at any greater risk of getting breast cancer than any other pregnant woman.”

That said, we should note that some women DO have a higher risk – such as having, say, a BRCA gene mutation or relatives with the mutation – and are told to have screening earlier than other women.

The 36yo star of the “Giuliana and Bill” reality tv show was advised by her doctor to have a mammogram after before starting her 3rd round of in-vitro fertilization (“IVF”) because the IVF hormones would accelerate any breast cancer development.

Fortunately, Giuliana’s breast cancer is in the early stages, and so a complete cure is very likely.

A Mexican beauty queen, Cynthia de la Vega, has claimed she was stripped of her crown because she put on a mere six pounds. But organisers of Nuestra Belleza Mexico withdrew the 19-year-old’s title last month, claiming that she had a ‘lack of dedication and discipline.’ Miss de la Vega admitted she had gained weight due to the stress of the upcoming Miss World pageant, but she had not been warned of any physical requirements for the competition.

Last September, Cynthia de la Vega was first runner up for Nuestra Belleza Mexico, a position that normally goes on to compete in Miss World. (The contest’s winner competes in Miss Universe.) She had been preparing to compete in the Miss World pageant which will be held in London on November 6.

During a press conference, Miss de la Vega revealed that pageant coach Luis Rangel prescribed her with a diet plan via email, which consisted of ‘the same food during the whole month.’ She said: ‘Organizers of the Nuestra Belleza Mexico contest demanded that I lose a few kilos, but they never provided a nutritionist or any other assistance to ensure the weight loss.’ A good nutrition plan, the kind she would have needed to meet the pageant’s standards, “should be specific for each day of the week and should also be supervised to make the necessary adjustments.”

CNNMexico reports that Lupita Jones, director of Nuestra Belleza Mundo México, claims that it was a lack of discipline and dedication that rendered de la Vega ineligible, not specifically a matter of weight.

In a statement announcing the withdrawal of Miss de la Vega’s crown, Nuestra Belleza Mexico said weight had nothing to do with its decision. It simply read that that the beauty ‘did not comply with the recommendations and goals agreed upon for her preparation.’

“The training of a beauty queen is equivalent to the training of an athlete – there is no cutting corners on sleep, a zero tolerance for alcohol, and long hours of preparation,” Lupita Jones, Mexico’s first Miss Universe winner, who now heads Nuestra Belleza.

After winning Miss Universe in 2010 expectations were sure to be high for Mexico in Miss World and other internationals. The organisation said that it would be replacing her with Gabriela Palacio, who would enter Miss World in her place.
De la Vega affirmed that there’s nothing about her body that prevents her from competing. “I feel healthy enough to represent my country,” she told CNNMexico, “and I think this is an injustice. They took away the crown that I earned. That is mine.”

On Tuesday, she appeared on Good Morning America saying she was “sad and very deceived.”
“I cried and cried and cried,” she told the show. Miss de la Vega said all she wants is to represent her country. The pageant’s move disqualifies her from being a contender of the Miss World contest.

If de la Vega is right, it wouldn’t be the first time a beauty queen has lost her title over some extra calories.
Earlier this year, Domonique Ramírez, 17, who won Miss San Antonio, caused a stir when she was allegedly told by pageant officials to “get off the tacos.” She was stripped of her title for supposed conduct unbecoming of a beauty queen, but she later sued and won her crown back.